An eco-innovate challenge by Prakriti Club, IIT Guwahati, run with Techniche — and home to the 1st International Conference on Sustainable Innovation & Green Technologies.
Our flagship eco-hackathon, run with Techniche, IIT Guwahati, and home to ICSIGT 2026 — the International Conference on Sustainable Innovation & Green Technologies held as part of Avinya. Open to students of every discipline at any institution.
Total prize pool, including ₹65,000 in cash, plus branded goodies and tools.
Participants registered, verified against completed registration form and fee payment.
Per team. Any stream — engineering, science, design or management.
An online proposal round, then a 30 hour on-campus build sprint, extended by 6 hours.
Teams chose one problem statement from a curated set, built a solution around it, and submitted a structured presentation. Proposals were judged by a panel of experts on four criteria:
Shortlisted teams were invited to the IIT Guwahati campus to present their prototypes live to an expert jury, then took on fresh problem statements from industry mentors in an intensive 30 hour sprint, which opened at 6:00 PM on 29 August and closed at 6:00 AM on 31 August after a 6 hour extension — 36 hours in total. Scored evenly between the two phases.
Proposals and prototypes were assessed by this panel of experts.
Medical & Health Officer
Sonapur
Outreach Head
TIC, IIT Guwahati
Co-Founder
Universal Times Magazine
Overnight evaluation and judge communication during the 30 hour build sprint.
Because the build sprint ran without a break from 6:00 PM on 29 August to 6:00 AM on 31 August, evaluation could not be left to a single sitting at the end. These student panelists were stationed with the shortlisted teams through the night, tracked each submission against its published problem statement and the four scoring criteria, and resolved routine clarifications on the spot so that no team was ever left blocked waiting for a decision. Every problem statement was covered — PS 1 and PS 2 included — so that no track was left unevaluated and no submission went unscored. The same panelists acted as the single point of contact between the floor and the jury — carrying questions up to the judges and returning with scoring guidance — so that every team received the same information at the same time. This kept the overnight evaluation consistent, transparent and contestant friendly, without interrupting the judges’ own deliberation.
Student Panelist
M.Tech, Robotics & Artificial Intelligence
IIT Guwahati
Student Panelist
5th Year PhD, Department of Chemistry
IIT Guwahati
Student Panelist
5th Year PhD, School of Energy Science & Engineering
IIT Guwahati
Students of IIT Guwahati and engineers from its Technology Innovation Hub who mentored the participant teams across project and event management.
M.Tech in Robotics and Artificial Intelligence
M.Tech in Robotics and Artificial Intelligence
M.Tech in Biomedical Engineering
M.Tech, Medical Devices and Diagnostics
Project Staff, Bio-science and Bio-engineering
PhD, Department of Physics
Department of Physics
M.Tech, Chemical Engineering
M.Tech, Chemical Engineering
M.Tech, Chemical Engineering
M.Tech, Chemical Engineering
Assistant Engineer, Technology Innovation Hub (IIT Guwahati)
priyakemp@tih.iitg.ac.in
Niloy Dev is listed in both groups, having mentored teams and also served as a student panelist.
Nine problem statements were published across three tracks, and every one of them was evaluated. Each was assessed against the published problem statement it was set for and against the same four scoring criteria — PS 1 and PS 2 included. No problem statement was skipped, none was short-changed, and none was judged on a different standard from any other.
Every one of the 49 scored entries was assessed on the same evidence, by the same rubric, in both rounds — so the comparison between teams rests on what they actually submitted rather than on who presented it best. Alongside the rubric, the event’s Code of Conduct applied throughout: conduct was a process matter in its own right, handled separately from the score.
The text and images were extracted from each submitted deck and read, rather than scored from a title slide or a thumbnail.
Where a demo video was submitted, it was watched as part of the entry for both rounds.
Claimed working links were requested over the network at scoring time. A link was credited only if it actually responded.
The size of each public repository was recorded through the GitHub API, so the working claim and the code behind it could be compared.
Each entry was checked against the theme its problem statement was set for, so a polished but off-topic build could not outrank a focused one.
The Code of Conduct applied during evaluation, not only during the sprint. Other teams’ workspaces, code and accounts were off limits; work had to be a team’s own or properly attributed; and nobody could knowingly misrepresent the results, data or capability of a submission. Conduct was dealt with under the Code of Conduct as a separate matter from the score.
Deductions for placeholder entries, near-empty decks and unusable links were applied from a single published rule set, in the same way to every entry — never case by case.
Registration and the proposal round open on Unstop.
Proposal deadline, 11:59 PM IST.
Selection letters issued to qualifying teams.
30 hour build alongside Techniche, opening 6:00 PM on 29 August and closing 6:00 AM on 31 August after a further 6 hour extension.
Selected teams delivered their oral presentations at the international conference across 31 August and 1 September.
Poster presentations, followed by the announcement of the hackathon results.
Poster presentations, followed by the announcement of the international conference results.
Every participation certificate carries a scannable Verify code carrying a digital signature. Anyone can check a certificate independently — the code is validated against the club's issued record, so a forged or altered certificate is rejected.
Registration figures are as reported by the Unstop listing, which counts live and varies slightly between visits. Deadlines and the problem-statement set follow the official Avinya 2026 poster.
The 1st International Conference on Sustainable Innovation & Green Technologies, run as the conference arm of Avinya 2026 by Prakriti Club under the Technical Board, Students' Gymkhana Council, IIT Guwahati.
“Innovating Sustainability. Empowering Tomorrow.”
Two conference days at IIT Guwahati, following the Avinya finals in August.
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India.
The inaugural ICSIGT conference, on the theme of sustainable innovation.
Participation is completely free for all attendees, including participants from outside IIT Guwahati. No registration fee, no charge per presentation.
Four themes, each matched to working club technology.
Real-time flood and hazard detection, geolocation-based threat alerts, and automated SOS response.
Plastic-to-brick conversion, waterless paper production, and community-scale waste-to-energy systems.
RFID-based digital entry-exit logging and touchless smart dustbins with ultrasonic fill-level tracking.
Food-waste bio-digestion and automated water quality monitoring with live pH and TDS sensing.
Selected work is presented as a poster. The official ICSIGT 2026 template is a single portrait sheet sized 36 × 48 inches. Use the section order below so every poster reads the same way.
Template: 1st International Conference on Sustainable Innovation and Green Technologies (ICSIGT 2026) — Prakriti, IIT Guwahati, supplied as a PowerPoint file.
Every Avinya 2026 certificate carries a signed Verify code. It is not a decoration — it is a digital signature that only the club can produce, checked against the club's own record of what it issued.
A genuine certificate passes three independent checks: its contents are unaltered, its signature is the club's, and its number appears in the issued register. A forged or edited certificate fails.
The verifier runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you paste is uploaded, and it works with no internet connection.
Every certificate has its own code, unique to that holder and signed by the club.